The fashion/reality TV love affair is still going strong

Giving yet more proof to the adage that truth is stranger — and hence makes better TV — than fiction (O.K., I added that middle bit) is the news that two new fashion/reality TV shows are in the works. Diane von Furstenberg is in the midst of filming her own series, “The DVF Project” for E!, in which young women compete to be her “global ambassador,” and according to The Hollywood Reporter, Lifetime has commissioned “Threads,” a teen version of “Project Runway” from, yes, the “Project Runway” folks.
Lifetime also, by the by, has two other fashion-related docu-series in the works, which sound like ironic commentary on the industry à la “Spinal Tap” but seem to be entirely serious: “Worst Stylist Ever” and “Ugly Models.” They are, I think, self-explanatory.
Anyway, it’s pretty clear why TV likes fashion — it is immediately accessible, full of drama, nice to look at — but the appeal to fashion, especially establishment fashion, is more complicated. Which is why of the above, I find the DVF show the most potentially interesting: It signifies the first embrace of the pop-culture phenomenon that is reality TV by an establishment name since Michael Kors took on “Project Runway” in 2004. Ms. von Furstenberg is, after all, president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America. She’s as establishment as it gets.
Traditionally, and probably not surprisingly when it comes to film on the big or small screen, the major names feel more comfortable with classic documentary filmmaking (see: Gucci, Dior, Tiffany) and its associated seriousness of purpose than with reality TV, and its pop culture, more mass-denominator, embrace. Mr. Kors was, in this context, something of an outlier. (He left “Project Runway” last year because of scheduling conflicts.)
So why would Ms. von Furstenberg venture into such territory?
She said, on announcing the show, that she saw it as a chance “to grant young women the opportunity to become the women they want to be,” but I wonder if there is not also another, canny reason behind the project. After all, Mr. Kors is now something of an extraordinarily successful outlier, post-his-IPO-of-December 2011 (total revenue was up almost 52 percent to $3.3 billion for fiscal 2013).
Though you cannot quantify the effect exactly, the chief executive John Idol told me last year that he felt part of this success could be attributed to Mr. Kors’s very high Q rating thanks to his “Project Runway” fame. As James Carville might say, “It’s the TV, stupid.”
So yes: high risk (you could be dragged down by the “Ugly Models” taint) but also potentially high reward. Especially for brands with growth plans.
Betcha other designers will tune in for this one.